Davis Sharp
Well-Known Member
I should probably just keep my opinion to myself, but there are plenty of artists that I just don't get. Guns n Roses are one. Bruce Springsteen is another. U2? they had a couple of good songs, but biggest band in the world.? Please! I mean they're all....OK?I don't know, I must be missing something, what is the big deal?
OK, now pile on.......
For a long time, I didn't get Springsteen either. - I mean, his most complex songs have 3 chords . But as I got older and listened closely, I've come to think of his music as folk music with a hard edge. Now I strongly doubt that I was the only one not looking at that perspective at the height of his popularity (forgive my arrogance, but I don't think that the wider musical audience thinks as much as I do about music). So I'm not sure why he was as popular as he was. No doubt he busts is _ss on stage and maybe his songs have some simple hooks that resonate with people.
I didn't like U2 until the Joshua Tree album. But they are also able to make an emotional connection with people. And, when you strip away the musical and lyrical credentials of the band, music is all about making people feel something.
But I get what you're saying. Setting aside the Beatles and Elvis, many bands have a few big songs or a couple of notable albums. Why some of them become outrageously famous and others don't is a mystery to me.
Last edited: